top of page

It is unfortunate that a district that is known for its diverse culture and it touted for its many languages, has an all-white, English-speaking parent committee for their sex education curriculum. It was noted at Cajon Valley Union School District’s most recent DELAC meeting. DELAC is an acronym for the District English Learner Advisory Committee that was held on September 20th at the District office. A concerned parent brought up the fact that there are only white, English-speaking parents on the committee that is designing the Sex Ed Curriculum. The answer the district spokesperson gave was it was a “lottery process” and that a board member “picked the numbers” that ultimately decided who was on the committee. Another parent who sits on the committee currently asked if more parents from the DELAC meeting could be included… and the district spokesperson said, “That wouldn’t be fair to everyone else who was in the lottery and didn’t get picked.” Come to find out, only 4 to 8 parents have been coming to the meetings. The meetings allow for at least 16 parents. There is room, but the DELAC community is being disregarded for some reason.


So, who can fix this?

President Jim Miller. President Miller sets the agenda and can appoint committee members. This would be an easy solution. He could appoint and direct the committee to have significant parent engagement that represents the diverse and engaged parent community. He has let this situation go on without resolution. Under President Miller, many things are not happening as the board policies and bylaws dictate. It is tyrannical and fits a very controlled and contrived narrative of the Superintendent. Many of the rules being bent or not followed are not for the benefit of students, but to rather to protect a Superintendent that is highly paid. While the Superintendent’s pay is rising CVUSD’s student test scores are plummeting. Parents want to be engaged, parents of all communities.


Ask yourself these questions:

· Are some voices not as significant?

· Do their children matter?

· Do they have a right to be engaged as parents?

· Why would the district exclude the communities they exploit in their promotional videos?


· Why wouldn’t the district appoint parents from various groups first to make sure they have significant engagement and then add more parents randomly through lottery (School Site Council, LCAP, DELAC, PTA/PTO, Parents who have raised concerns at board meetings)?


THIS IS NOT SIGNIFICANT PARENT ENGAGEMENT. In fact, a committee should have an appointed parent as a chairperson and should be giving recommendations and results to the board. We do not have that in CVUSD, they have a consultant firm called Educators Cooperative that speaks for the parents.


What happened to #YouBelong?



Want to know more? Please read the following (boring but necessary) facts about the leadership at CVUSD:


Under the leadership of Board president, Jim Miller, the Board has failed to consider the following policies as relevant or of any importance, therefore, being negligible in their charge for proper oversight, governance, and accountability. The Board remains out of compliance with the following Board Bylaws:


POLICIES AND REGULATIONS


9000: Board Bylaws - 9121 BB

BOARD PRESIDENT


• Enforces the Board's policies relating to the conduct of meetings and helps ensure compliance with applicable requirements of the Brown Act. The Board president & superintendent, not being in compliance with Board Bylaws, has created an environment of mistrust and adversarial tension on the Board and for the community.

• Working with the Superintendent to ensure that Board members have necessary materials and information - This has not been consistent or timely, and at times adversarial.


9000: Board Bylaws - 9124 BB

ATTORNEY


• The Board and Superintendent shall annually evaluate the performance of the firm and/or attorneys providing legal services in such areas as efficiency and adequacy of advice; results obtained for the district; reasonableness of fees; and responsiveness to and interactions with the Board, administration, and community.

• Upon a successful evaluation, the Board may renew the agreement with legal counsel without initiating an RFP. - This practice has been non-existent under the past & present Board leadership. Under the current Board president, a Board member’s request to be compliant was disregarded.


9000: Board Bylaws - 9130 BB

BOARD COMMITTEES


• The Governing Board may establish a committee whenever it determines that such a committee would benefit the district by providing diverse viewpoints, specialized knowledge or expertise, or increased efficiency. Such committees may be subcommittees of the Board or committees that include members of the community, staff, or other stakeholder groups.


• Upon establishing a committee, the Board shall clearly define the committee's purpose, any timeline for completion of assigned responsibilities, any stakeholder groups, or individuals to be represented on the committee, length of time that committee members are expected to serve, and expectations for reporting to the Board and/or the Superintendent or designee. Unless specifically authorized by the Board to act on its behalf, the committee shall act in an advisory capacity.

• Except for subcommittees of the Board, committee members shall, as appropriate, be recommended by the Superintendent or designee and appointed by the Board president, subject to Board approval. - The Board president has disregarded all aspects of this Board Bylaw in establishing the Sex Curriculum & Safety subcommittees which is explicit to having greater parental involvement.


0000: Philosophy, Goals, Objectives, and Comprehensive Plans

VISION -0000 AR (Administrative Regulation)


The Superintendent or designee shall establish a process for developing and regularly reviewing the district's vision and direction which includes:

1. Clearly defined procedures, timelines and responsibilities

2. Identification of the strengths and needs of the district

3. Input from parents/guardians, students, staff and community members through procedures which may include surveys, focus groups, advisory committees and/or public meetings and forums

4. Board adoption of district vision statements at a public meeting

As part of this process, the Superintendent or designee shall provide the Governing Board with relevant district documents and data, including current district mission and vision statements, if any, and information about student demographics, student achievement, student enrollment patterns, current programs, and recent program cuts, staffing and professional development needs, budget trends, facilities, technology and emerging educational issues.

2000: Administration - 2140 BB EVALUATION OF THE SUPERINTENDENT


• The Governing Board recognizes that, in order to effectively fulfill its responsibilities for setting direction, ensuring accountability, and providing community leadership for the district, it must adopt measures for holding the Superintendent accountable. At a minimum, the Board shall annually conduct a formal evaluation of the Superintendent's performance to assess his/her effectiveness in leading the district toward established goals. In addition, the evaluation process may include opportunities during the year for review of the Superintendent's progress toward meeting the goals. The evaluation shall be in accordance with the provisions of the Superintendent's contract and any applicable Board policy.

• Evaluation criteria shall be agreed upon by the Board and Superintendent prior to the evaluation and shall include, but not be limited to, district goals and success indicators; educational, management, and community leadership skills; and the Superintendent's professional relationship with the Board.

• The Board and Superintendent shall jointly determine the evaluation method(s) and schedule that will best serve the district and the structure and format of the instrument to be used.

• Prior to the evaluation, the Superintendent shall provide to the Board for its review a report of progress toward district goals, the Superintendent's self-appraisal of accomplishments and performance, and a statement of actions taken to address any Board recommendation from the previous evaluation.


• Each Board member shall independently evaluate the Superintendent's performance. Based on these individual evaluations, the Board president shall produce a document that summarizes the individual evaluations. The Board shall then take action on this document and present it to the Superintendent for his/her response.


• The evaluation shall provide commendations in areas of strength and achievement, provide recommendations for improving effectiveness in areas of concern and unsatisfactory performance, and serve as a basis for making decisions about salary increase and/or contract extension.

• The Board shall meet in closed session with the Superintendent to discuss the evaluation. (Government Code 54957)


• The Superintendent shall have an opportunity to ask questions, respond verbally and in writing to the evaluation, and present additional evidence of his/her performance or district progress.


• After the Board and Superintendent have discussed the evaluation, the Board president and Superintendent shall sign the evaluation and it shall be placed in the Superintendent's personnel file.


• At the open session after the Superintendent's evaluation or at a subsequent meeting, the Board and Superintendent shall jointly identify performance goals for the next year.


- The specific process and requirements as outlined in both policies above have been ignored by the prior board and under the current Board president. The Board has been completely and fully negligible in their oversight to hold their only employee accountable. The Board president has repeatedly denied the requests of a Board member and a cure & correct demand letter signed by over 20 community citizens to administer a fully comprehensive evaluation with proper public notice.


Thank you for reading the whole article if you got to this point! Please, share this article and your thoughts with friends and family. If you are not in CVUSD, make sure you are also holding your own School Board and Superintendent accountable. Public oversight is important to keeping our communities our own.


In Unity,

The East County Guardians

 
 

It wasn't the slap heard around the world, because the school has done a fair job keeping this story out of the public's view. The incident occurred at Granite Hills High School in El Cajon. We are told that a teacher is accused of slapping a student. The teacher went home early that day and has not returned to teaching....yet. Our sources tell us that there is a possibility that the teacher will be reinstated before Thanksgiving Break. The details were explained as "delicate" because the teacher is from a "protected class" and the student is a faith based individual. I understand that we do not have all the details that led up to the slap, or even clear details on the student or the teacher. I want our readers to think about their individual lines in the sand. Ask yourself these questions:

  • What could the student have said or done to justify being slapped by their teacher?

  • Is there any reason you can think of that would warrant, excuse, even celebrate, physical abuse from a teacher toward a student?

  • Does it matter that the student comes from any particular faith?

  • Does it matter that the teacher belongs to a "protected class"?

  • When is it acceptable for a teacher to abuse a child, and return to work?

  • When can a student cross the line with a teacher/staff and be in danger of a physical response?

The next Grossmont Union High School District Board Meeting is September 12th, at 4pm (for closed session). The reason I say 4pm, is because there are closed session items that include reprimands for staff. We can't be sure that this involves the same teacher, however letting them know before they potentially discuss reprimands would be beneficial. You can find the full agenda here:


If you wish to speak on this topic as a comment you would need to be at the meeting early to pull a speaker card and speak during public comment. Some questions for the board to ponder:

  • Can you provide an update to the investigation? At least letting the public know if abuse took place and the decision that was made after the investigation?

  • If they can say if abuse took place at any point, should they ask if other students have been abused by this teacher?

  • What steps are they taking to direct the superintendent to make sure abuse is not happening to our students on campus?

  • What are the protocols and procedures that take place when abuse is reported? Do they call the police and make a report? Does the report go beyond the campus police officer that has prior relationships with staff? Has a report or an outside investigation with law enforcement taken place?

  • School employees are mandated reporters. How many people reported what they heard or saw? Did the principal follow up with the reports?

  • Can you ensure the public that protocol was followed and describe what that looks like?

  • Can you make sure that children are a more protected class than any staff member's protected class status?

  • Let them know how you feel about the potential of this teacher returning to campus if they slapped the student.

  • Let them know where you draw the line on teacher's abusing students. Is there a time when it is appropriate? Or should it be zero tolerance?

I hope this situation is handled appropriately. I hear that it is a delicate situation. I wonder if the student felt that their teacher was delicate when they were slapped? Is "delicate" what we need to handle this situation? I hope this isn't a "slap on the wrist" discipline for the teacher, if they did in fact slap a student.


In Unity,

The East County Guardians






 
 

ree

We are off to the races! The school board

race that is! I know what you may be thinking: "This is for next year right?" That is

correct! You will be able to vote for Alex in November 2024 if you live in district 5 for Cajon Valley Union School District. Check out the map of trustees below.


Things we love about Alex:

  • He is a good man: honest and has integrity.

  • He is a father to young children and believes that the public school system should be a viable choice.

  • He is from East County and understands his potential constituents.

  • He wants to ensure Parental Rights are respected.

  • He is an advocate for fiscal transparency and accountability.

Want to help Alex get elected or learn more?



The race for school board is just now heating up. Check back here for updates!


ree














 
 
bottom of page